Citus BlogCitus Blog

As part of my work on the open source PostgreSQL team at Microsoft, I recently committed a new feature into PostgreSQL 14 to track dependencies on collation versions, with help from co-author Julien Rouhaud and the many others who contributed ideas. It took a long time to build a consensus on how to tackle this thorny problem (work I began at EnterpriseDB and continued at Microsoft), and you can read about some of the details and considerations in the commit message below and the referenced discussion thread. Please note that some details may change by the time PostgreSQL 14 is released.

commit 257836a75585934cc05ed7a80bccf8190d41e056
    Author: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
    Date:   Mon Nov 2 19:50:45 2020 +1300
    
        Track collation versions for indexes.
    
        Record the current version of dependent collations in pg_depend when
        creating or rebuilding an index.  When accessing the index later, warn
        that the index may be corrupted if the current version doesn't match.
    
        Thanks to Douglas Doole, Peter Eisentraut, Christoph Berg, Laurenz Albe,
        Michael Paquier, Robert Haas, Tom Lane and others for very helpful
        discussion.
    
        Author: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
        Author: Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]>
        Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> (earlier versions)
        Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D0uEQCpfq_%2BLYFBdArCe4Ot98t1aR4eYiYTe%3DyavQygiQ%40mail.gmail.com
    

I’m pretty happy with the result so far, but there is more to be done (see further down)! Now seems like a good time to walk you through the problem we needed to solve—that PostgreSQL indexes can get corrupted by changes in collations that occur naturally over time—and how the new feature makes things better in PostgreSQL 14. Plus, you’ll get a bit of background on collations, too.

If you’ve built your application on Postgres, you already know why so many people love Postgres.

And if you’re new to Postgres, the list of reasons people love Postgres is loooong—and includes things like: 3 decades of database reliability baked in; rich datatypes; support for custom types; myriad index types from B-tree to GIN to BRIN to GiST; support for JSON and JSONB from early days; constraints; foreign data wrappers; rollups; the geospatial capabilities of the PostGIS extension, and all the innovations that come from the many Postgres extensions.

But what to do if your Postgres database gets very large?

Stored procedures are widely used in commercial relational databases. You write most of your application logic in PL/SQL and achieve notable performance gains by pushing this logic into the database. As a result, customers who are looking to migrate from other databases to PostgreSQL usually make heavy use of stored procedures.

When migrating from a large database, using the Citus extension to distribute your database can be an attractive option, because you will always have enough hardware capacity to power your workload. The Hyperscale (Citus) option in Azure Database for PostgreSQL makes it easy to get a managed Citus cluster in minutes.

In the past, customers who migrated stored procedures to Citus often reported poor performance because each statement in the procedure involved an extra network round trip between the Citus coordinator node and the worker nodes. We also observed this ourselves when we evaluated Citus performance using the TPC-C-based workload in HammerDB (TPROC-C), which is implemented using stored procedures.

When I gave the kickoff talk in the Postgres devroom at FOSDEM this year, one of the Q&A questions was: “what’s happening with the Citus open source extension to Postgres?” The answer is, a lot. Since FOSDEM, Marco Slot and I have blogged about how Citus 9.2 speeds up large-scale htap workloads on Postgres, the Citus 9.3 release notes, and what’s new in Citus 9.4.

Now it’s time to walk through everything new in the Citus 9.5 open source release.

GPS has become part of our daily life. GPS is in cars for navigation, in smartphones helping us to find places, and more recently GPS has been helping us to avoid getting infected by COVID-19. Managing and analyzing mobility tracks is the core of my work. My group in Université libre de Bruxelles specializes in mobility data management. We build an open source database system for spatiotemporal trajectories, called MobilityDB. MobilityDB adds support for temporal and spatiotemporal objects to the Postgres database and its spatial extension, PostGIS. If you’re not yet familiar with spatiotemporal trajectories, not to worry, we’ll walk through some movement trajectories for a public transport bus in just a bit.

One of my team’s projects is to develop a distributed version of MobilityDB. This is where we came in touch with the Citus extension to Postgres and the Citus engineering team. This post presents issues and solutions for distributed query processing of movement trajectory data. GPS is the most common source of trajectory data, but the ideas in this post also apply to movement trajectories collected by other location tracking sensors, such as radar systems for aircraft, and AIS systems for sea vessels.

One of the unique things about Postgres is that it is highly programmable via PL/pgSQL and extensions. Postgres is so programmable that I often think of Postgres as a computing platform rather than just a database (or a distributed computing platform—with Citus). As a computing platform, I always felt that Postgres should be able to take actions in an automated way. That is why I created the open source pg_cron extension back in 2016 to run periodic jobs in Postgres—and why I continue to maintain pg_cron now that I work on the Postgres team at Microsoft.

Using pg_cron, you can schedule Postgres queries to run periodically, according to the familiar cron syntax. Some typical examples:

In my work as an engineer on the Postgres team at Microsoft, I get to meet all sorts of customers going through many challenging projects. One recent database migration project I worked on is a story that just needs to be told. The customer—in the retail space—was using Redshift as the data warehouse and Databricks as their ETL engine. Their setup was deployed on AWS and GCP, across different data centers in different regions. And they’d been running into performance bottlenecks and also was incurring unnecessary egress cost.

Specifically, the amount of data in our customer’s analytic store was growing faster than the compute required to process that data. AWS Redshift was not able to offer independent scaling of storage and compute—hence our customer was paying extra cost by being forced to scale up the Redshift nodes to account for growing data volumes. To address these issues, they decided to migrate their analytics landscape to Azure.

I recently analyzed the limits of connection scalability, to understand the most effective way to improve Postgres’ handling of large numbers of connections, and why that is important. I concluded that the most pressing issue is snapshot scalability.

This post details the improvements I recently contributed to Postgres 14 (to be released Q3 of 2021), significantly reducing the identified snapshot scalability bottleneck.

As the explanation of the implementation details is fairly long, I thought it’d be more fun for of you if I start with the results of the work, instead of the technical details (I’m cheating, I know ;)).

Postgres is an amazing RDBMS implementation. Postgres is open source and it’s one of the most standard-compliant SQL implementations that you will find (if not the most compliant.) Postgres is packed with extensions to the standard, and it makes writing and deploying your applications simple and easy. After all, Postgres has your back and manages all the complexities of concurrent transactions for you.

In this post I am excited to announce that a new version of pg_auto_failover has been released, pg_auto_failover 1.4.

pg_auto_failover is an extension to Postgres built for high availability (HA), that monitors and manages failover for Postgres clusters. Our guiding principles from day one have been simplicity and correctness. Since pg_auto_failover is open source, you can find it on GitHub and it’s easy to try out. Let’s walk through what’s new in pg_auto_failover, and let’s explore the new capabilities you can take advantage of.

One common challenge with Postgres for those of you who manage busy Postgres databases, and those of you who foresee being in that situation, is that Postgres does not handle large numbers of connections particularly well.

While it is possible to have a few thousand established connections without running into problems, there are some real and hard-to-avoid problems.

Since joining Microsoft last year in the Azure Database for PostgreSQL team—where I work on open source Postgres—I have spent a lot of time analyzing and addressing some of the issues with connection scalability in Postgres.